Monday, February 24, 2020

Slavery Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Slavery - Assignment Example Senator Calhoun justifies the Southern states’ democratic right to own slaves. Senator Calhoun affirms Slavery benefits both the slave owners and the slaves (Niven 49). Slavery benefits both the White slave owners and the African American slaves. In terms of physical, intellectual and moral standards, the Senator states that those living in Africa have not reached any success compared to the African American slaves who were brought to the United States. Senator Calhoun equates the Southern White slave owners as equal in status with the Northern White American. The North American Whites freed their African American Slaves. On the other hand, the South American White Owners decided to hold on to their personal properties, the African American slaves. The Senator goes further by stating that the White Slave owners treat their Southern Slaves far better than societies in other countries treat their paid employees. Consequently, Senator Calhoun boasts that the Southern American States’ White owners treat their African American Slaves better than other societies treat their employees. As a resident of one of the Southern States, Senator Calhoun proudly states that the Southern White Americans treat their slaves far better than the White people from other communities treat their African American employees. Everyone is entitled to one’s opinion. Senator Calhoun is entitled to his preference for the institution of slavery. Senator Calhoun believes that removing the slaves from the Southern slave owners would bring hardship to the White slave owners. With the slaves, the White slave owners of the South will be forced to work in the farms and other labor activities. The senator is creating a false impression that God had destined the African American people to be the slaves of the White Americans. In the same manner, Senator Calhoun insists that it is a god given right for the White Americans to use the forced African

Friday, February 7, 2020

The Novel John Cheever Bullet Park and John Cheever, The Essay

The Novel John Cheever Bullet Park and John Cheever, The Five-Forty-Eight - Essay Example g the absurdity of the surroundings’ and pointlessness of their behaviors and actions, his stories hold out the hope of redemption in love and sense of revenge and unforgiving attitude Such as in the story â€Å"Five-forty-Five† and his novel† The bullet park†. John Cheever was a complex person himself and during the course of his life he was saddled by the habit of alcoholism and infidelities but he presented himself so earnestly as a Man in Brooks’ brother suit, his life was as contradictory as his characters and so his writing is not neat and raises so many questions and answer’s very less.(The guardian,2009).  Cheever rightly described himself near the end of his life, in a heartbreaking sentence: "I am one of those old men; I am like a voyager who cannot remember the streams he has travelled." (Gottlieb,2002). In the novel â€Å" The Bullet Park†, author portrays an array of well kept houses and more than well mannered people of the town the Bullet Park but Cheever’s characters always has a double meaning to them and an unobserving reader might fail to see the crouching beast dangerously hidden behind those well kept houses. The story unfolds as a fateful intersection of two men the innocent Eliot Nailles and his nemesis, Paul Hammer, whose object is to murder his neighbors son, takes place. The novel has an aura of retribution from the beginning. For example the chosen names for the characters are Hammer and Nailles, which show the exact opposite of each other and every quality of hammer is lacked in a nail. It is the first impression of reckless and conflicting situation between the two characters and the author tried to expose their rivalry for each other by his blunt, quite witty and creative writing.(Shannon,1998) Cheever’s view of rivalry and revenge is also seen in the description of his characters as the two main characters’ were exactly opposite of each other, in short the characters are also in the state of conflict, not just in their